IDA resource allocation index in Bhutan
Bhutan: IDA resource allocation index was 3.8 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
IDA resource allocation index in Bhutan, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for ida resource allocation index in Bhutan is 3.8 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
The figure is up 0.7% on the previous year and up 2.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in Bhutan peaked at 3.92 1=low to 6=high in 2021 and was at its lowest, 3.68 1=low to 6=high, in 2012.
That places Bhutan 11th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.86 1=low to 6=high | 3.79 1=low to 6=high | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.82 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 8 Cabo Verde 3.88 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Uzbekistan 3.84 1=low to 6=high compare
- 10 Kenya 3.82 1=low to 6=high compare
- 12 Togo 3.78 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 St. Lucia 3.73 1=low to 6=high compare
- 14 Moldova, Republic of 3.72 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bhutan
- Arms imports 4.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 5.16 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 4.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 104.88 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
- Tax revenue 12.3% (2020)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 245.49 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 19.9% (2020)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 94.12 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 8.39 (2019)
- Taxes on goods and services 17.9% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ida resource allocation index in Bhutan?
- Ida resource allocation index in Bhutan was 3.8 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.92 1=low to 6=high in 2021.
- What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.68 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- How does Bhutan rank for ida resource allocation index?
- Bhutan ranks 11th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).