IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) in IBRD only
IBRD only: IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) was 3.54 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▼ Falling
IDA resource allocation index in IBRD only, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2019, ida resource allocation index in IBRD only stood at 3.54 1=low to 6=high.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.6% on the previous year and down 5.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in IBRD only peaked at 3.75 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 3.45 1=low to 6=high, in 2016.
IBRD only ranks 5th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high) in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.64 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 3.74 1=low to 6=high | +2.5% |
| 2008 | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2009 | 3.74 1=low to 6=high | -0.3% |
| 2010 | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2011 | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2012 | 3.69 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 3.53 1=low to 6=high | -1.8% |
| 2016 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | -2.1% |
| 2017 | 3.52 1=low to 6=high | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | +1.2% |
| 2019 | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | -0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.59 1=low to 6=high | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
More public sector data for IBRD only
- Arms imports 14.75 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.36 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0003 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -10.26 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 11.74 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 171.58 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.021 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 12.21 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 854.40 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 184.84 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ida resource allocation index in IBRD only?
- Ida resource allocation index in IBRD only was 3.54 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 3.75 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
- What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.45 1=low to 6=high in 2016.
- How does IBRD only rank for ida resource allocation index?
- IBRD only ranks 5th out of 42 groups with data for 2019.
- Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).