IDA resource allocation index in Pakistan
Pakistan: IDA resource allocation index was 3.31 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
IDA resource allocation index in Pakistan, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Pakistan recorded 3.31 1=low to 6=high for ida resource allocation index in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ida resource allocation index in Pakistan peaked at 3.66 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.07 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Pakistan 38th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.47 1=low to 6=high | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.66 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.07 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
More public sector data for Pakistan
- Arms imports 982.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 3.91 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0026 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -58.96 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 982.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 40.46 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0273 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 17.85 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 10.17 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 3,104 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ida resource allocation index in Pakistan?
- Ida resource allocation index in Pakistan was 3.31 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest ida resource allocation index recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.66 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest ida resource allocation index recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.07 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Pakistan rank for ida resource allocation index?
- Pakistan ranks 38th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is ida resource allocation index rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).