R&D Environmental protection in Belgium
Belgium: R&D Environmental protection was 119.80 million in 2021. ◆ Volatile
R&D Environmental protection in Belgium, 2001–2021
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2021, r&d environmental protection in Belgium stood at 119.80 million. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
That represents a change of up 94.5% on the previous year and up 193.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, r&d environmental protection in Belgium peaked at 119.80 million in 2021 and was at its lowest, 3.40 million, in 2002.
That places Belgium 31st out of 89 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
R&D Environmental protection in Belgium, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 4.10 million | — |
| 2002 | 3.40 million | -17.1% |
| 2003 | 4.90 million | +44.1% |
| 2004 | 39.00 million | +695.9% |
| 2005 | 43.30 million | +11.0% |
| 2006 | 39.90 million | -7.9% |
| 2007 | 36.40 million | -8.8% |
| 2008 | 41.40 million | +13.7% |
| 2009 | 29.60 million | -28.5% |
| 2010 | 40.60 million | +37.2% |
| 2011 | 40.80 million | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 46.50 million | +14.0% |
| 2013 | 42.40 million | -8.8% |
| 2014 | 53.10 million | +25.2% |
| 2015 | 51.90 million | -2.3% |
| 2016 | 58.60 million | +12.9% |
| 2017 | 90.40 million | +54.3% |
| 2018 | 88.10 million | -2.5% |
| 2019 | 87.40 million | -0.8% |
| 2020 | 61.60 million | -29.5% |
| 2021 | 119.80 million | +94.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.89 million | 3.40 million | 43.30 million | 9 |
| 2010s | 59.98 million | 40.60 million | 90.40 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 90.70 million | 61.60 million | 119.80 million | 2 |
Countries ranked near Belgium
More public sector data for Belgium
- Arms imports 515.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 43.43 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0008 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -92.94 % change on previous year (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 515.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 721.97 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0128 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 12.22 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 8.56 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 393.52 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is r&d environmental protection in Belgium?
- R&d environmental protection in Belgium was 119.80 million in 2021, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest r&d environmental protection recorded in Belgium?
- The highest recorded value was 119.80 million in 2021.
- What is the lowest r&d environmental protection recorded in Belgium?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.40 million in 2002.
- How does Belgium rank for r&d environmental protection?
- Belgium ranks 31st out of 89 countries with data for 2021.
- Is r&d environmental protection rising or falling in Belgium?
- Over the last ten years it is up 193.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belgium data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of R&D Environmental protection (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).