R&D Environmental protection in Ecuador
Ecuador: R&D Environmental protection was 0 in 2022. ◆ Volatile
R&D Environmental protection in Ecuador, 2013–2022
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2022, r&d environmental protection in Ecuador stood at 0. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, r&d environmental protection in Ecuador peaked at 19.37 million in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2022.
That places Ecuador 60th out of 89 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
R&D Environmental protection in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 13.52 million | — |
| 2014 | 17.03 million | +26.0% |
| 2015 | 15.29 million | -10.2% |
| 2016 | 11.17 million | -26.9% |
| 2017 | 12.08 million | +8.2% |
| 2018 | 19.37 million | +60.3% |
| 2019 | 12.29 million | -36.5% |
| 2020 | 824,820 | -93.3% |
| 2021 | 92,374 | -88.8% |
| 2022 | 0 | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.39 million | 11.17 million | 19.37 million | 7 |
| 2020s | 305,732 | 0 | 824,820 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 57 Jordan 200,000 compare
- 58 Lithuania 78,000 compare
- 59 Malta 31,000 compare
- 60 Azerbaijan 0
- 60 Bahrain 0
- 60 Bahamas 0
- 60 Bhutan 0
- 60 Chile 0
- 60 Cook Islands 0
- 60 Cyprus 0
- 60 Dominican Republic 0
- 60 Micronesia, Federated States of 0
- 60 Georgia 0 compare
- 60 Greece 0
- 60 Hong Kong, China 0
- 60 Indonesia 0
- 60 Jamaica 0
- 60 Kenya 0 compare
- 60 Kosovo 0 compare
- 60 Kuwait 0
- 60 Maldives 0
- 60 Marshall Islands 0
- 60 Mauritius 0
- 60 Naoero 0
- 60 Panama 0
- 60 Palau 0
- 60 Romania 0 compare
- 60 Singapore 0
- 60 Solomon Islands 0
- 60 Seychelles 0 compare
- 60 Uganda 0
- 60 Zambia 0
More public sector data for Ecuador
- Arms imports 25.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.38 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 257.14 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 25.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 148.77 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0218 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 0.2229 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 2.70 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 28.18 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is r&d environmental protection in Ecuador?
- R&d environmental protection in Ecuador was 0 in 2022, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest r&d environmental protection recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 19.37 million in 2018.
- What is the lowest r&d environmental protection recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2022.
- How does Ecuador rank for r&d environmental protection?
- Ecuador ranks 60th out of 89 countries with data for 2022.
- Is r&d environmental protection rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of R&D Environmental protection (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).