R&D Environmental protection in Latvia
Latvia: R&D Environmental protection was 1.69 million in 2021. ◆ Volatile
R&D Environmental protection in Latvia, 2001–2021
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2021, r&d environmental protection in Latvia stood at 1.69 million.
The figure is down 5.1% on the previous year and up 2,622.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, r&d environmental protection in Latvia peaked at 1.78 million in 2020 and was at its lowest, 10,000, in 2001.
That places Latvia 50th out of 89 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
R&D Environmental protection in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 10,000 | — |
| 2002 | 20,000 | +100.0% |
| 2003 | 20,000 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 40,000 | +100.0% |
| 2005 | 40,000 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 60,000 | +50.0% |
| 2007 | 179,000 | +198.3% |
| 2008 | 286,000 | +59.8% |
| 2009 | 135,000 | -52.8% |
| 2010 | 160,000 | +18.5% |
| 2011 | 62,000 | -61.3% |
| 2012 | 72,000 | +16.1% |
| 2013 | 926,000 | +1186.1% |
| 2014 | 967,000 | +4.4% |
| 2015 | 988,000 | +2.2% |
| 2016 | 1.10 million | +11.1% |
| 2017 | 1.02 million | -7.4% |
| 2018 | 1.18 million | +15.7% |
| 2019 | 1.16 million | -1.4% |
| 2020 | 1.78 million | +53.1% |
| 2021 | 1.69 million | -5.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87,778 | 10,000 | 286,000 | 9 |
| 2010s | 762,800 | 62,000 | 1.18 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.73 million | 1.69 million | 1.78 million | 2 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 47 Kyrgyzstan 4.70 million compare
- 48 Armenia 2.79 million compare
- 49 Belarus 2.08 million compare
- 51 Luxembourg 1.67 million compare
- 52 Papua New Guinea 1.63 million compare
- 53 Mongolia 1.28 million compare
More public sector data for Latvia
- Arms imports 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 5.36 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -76.19 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 763.99 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0324 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 13.71 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.43 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 674.92 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is r&d environmental protection in Latvia?
- R&d environmental protection in Latvia was 1.69 million in 2021, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest r&d environmental protection recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.78 million in 2020.
- What is the lowest r&d environmental protection recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 10,000 in 2001.
- How does Latvia rank for r&d environmental protection?
- Latvia ranks 50th out of 89 countries with data for 2021.
- Is r&d environmental protection rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,622.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of R&D Environmental protection (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).