Revenue decentralization, Percent (Central government) in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Revenue decentralization, Percent (Central government) was 0.6923 in 2020. ▲ Rising
Revenue decentralization, Percent in Uzbekistan, 2011–2020
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for revenue decentralization, percent in Uzbekistan is 0.6923, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 19.0% on the previous year and up 22.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, revenue decentralization, percent in Uzbekistan peaked at 0.6923 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.5094, in 2017.
That places Uzbekistan 31st out of 67 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
Revenue decentralization, Percent (Central government) in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 0.5642 | — |
| 2012 | 0.5927 | +5.1% |
| 2013 | 0.536 | -9.6% |
| 2014 | 0.5292 | -1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.5336 | +0.8% |
| 2016 | 0.5344 | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 0.5094 | -4.7% |
| 2018 | 0.5885 | +15.5% |
| 2019 | 0.582 | -1.1% |
| 2020 | 0.6923 | +19.0% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 0.6923 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.8403, 82% of the median. (7 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 0.6923 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6261, 1.1× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5522 | 0.5094 | 0.5927 | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.6923 | 0.6923 | 0.6923 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More public sector data for Uzbekistan
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 32.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.4768 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -22.73 % change on previous year (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is revenue decentralization, percent in Uzbekistan?
- Revenue decentralization, percent in Uzbekistan was 0.6923 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest revenue decentralization, percent recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6923 in 2020.
- What is the lowest revenue decentralization, percent recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5094 in 2017.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for revenue decentralization, percent?
- Uzbekistan ranks 31st out of 67 countries with data for 2020.
- Is revenue decentralization, percent rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Revenue decentralization, Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.