Statistical performance: Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) in Kiribati

Kiribati: Statistical performance: Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) was 50 scale 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
50 scale 0-100
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
173rd
of 218 countries
All-time high
50 scale 0-100
in 2015
All-time low
20 scale 0-100
in 2004
Years of data
21
2004–2024

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Kiribati, 2004–2024

010203040502004201420242004: 20 scale 0-1002005: 20 scale 0-1002006: 20 scale 0-1002007: 20 scale 0-1002008: 20 scale 0-1002009: 20 scale 0-1002010: 30 scale 0-1002011: 30 scale 0-1002012: 30 scale 0-1002013: 30 scale 0-1002014: 30 scale 0-1002015: 50 scale 0-1002016: 50 scale 0-1002017: 40 scale 0-1002018: 40 scale 0-1002019: 40 scale 0-1002020: 50 scale 0-1002021: 50 scale 0-1002022: 50 scale 0-1002023: 50 scale 0-1002024: 50 scale 0-100

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Kiribati is 50 scale 0-100, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

The figure is up 66.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Kiribati peaked at 50 scale 0-100 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 20 scale 0-100, in 2004.

Kiribati ranks 173rd of 218 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

Statistical performance: Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100) in Kiribati, 2004 to 2024.
Year scale 0-100 Change
2004 20 scale 0-100 —
2005 20 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2006 20 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2007 20 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2008 20 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2009 20 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2010 30 scale 0-100 +50.0%
2011 30 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2012 30 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2013 30 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2014 30 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2015 50 scale 0-100 +66.7%
2016 50 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2017 40 scale 0-100 -20.0%
2018 40 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2019 40 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2020 50 scale 0-100 +25.0%
2021 50 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2022 50 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2023 50 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2024 50 scale 0-100 +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 50 scale 0-100 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 80 scale 0-100, 62% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 50 scale 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 70 scale 0-100, 71% of the median. (37 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 20 scale 0-100 20 scale 0-100 20 scale 0-100 6
2010s 37 scale 0-100 30 scale 0-100 50 scale 0-100 10
2020s 50 scale 0-100 50 scale 0-100 50 scale 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 172 Vanuatu 56.6 scale 0-100 compare
  2. 173 Botswana 50 scale 0-100 compare
  3. 173 Burundi 50 scale 0-100 compare
  4. 173 Central African Republic 50 scale 0-100 compare
  5. 173 Dominica 50 scale 0-100 compare
  6. 173 Papua New Guinea 50 scale 0-100 compare
  7. 173 Puerto Rico 50 scale 0-100 compare
  8. 173 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 50 scale 0-100 compare
  9. 173 Turkey 50 scale 0-100 compare
  10. 173 Turks and Caicos Islands 50 scale 0-100 compare
  11. 173 Tuvalu 50 scale 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 223 places →

More public sector data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Kiribati?
Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Kiribati was 50 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 50 scale 0-100 in 2015.
What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 20 scale 0-100 in 2004.
How does Kiribati rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score?
Kiribati ranks 173rd out of 218 countries with data for 2024.
Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is up 66.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Kiribati. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-1-data-use-score-scale-0-100/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-1-data-use-score-scale-0-100/kiribati/">Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
223 places, 4,635 data points, 2004–2024
Last refreshed

The data use overall score is a composite score measuring the demand side of the statistical system. The data use pillar is segmented by five types of users: (i) the legislature, (ii) the executive branch, (iii) civil society (including sub-national actors), (iv) academia and (v) international bodies. Each dimension would have associated indicators to measure performance. A mature system would score well across all dimensions whereas a less mature one would have weaker scores along certain dimensions. The gaps would give insights into prioritization among user groups and help answer questions as to why the existing services are not resulting in higher use of national statistics in a particular segment. Currently, the SPI only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.