Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda
Rwanda: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score was 90 scale 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda, 2004–2024
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.
Analysis
In 2024, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda stood at 90 scale 0-100.
The figure is up 125.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda peaked at 100 scale 0-100 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 20 scale 0-100, in 2004.
Rwanda ranks 61st of 218 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | scale 0-100 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 20 scale 0-100 | — |
| 2005 | 40 scale 0-100 | +100.0% |
| 2006 | 30 scale 0-100 | -25.0% |
| 2007 | 30 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 30 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 30 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 50 scale 0-100 | +66.7% |
| 2011 | 30 scale 0-100 | -40.0% |
| 2012 | 30 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 40 scale 0-100 | +33.3% |
| 2014 | 40 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 60 scale 0-100 | +50.0% |
| 2016 | 80 scale 0-100 | +33.3% |
| 2017 | 90 scale 0-100 | +12.5% |
| 2018 | 100 scale 0-100 | +11.1% |
| 2019 | 90 scale 0-100 | -10.0% |
| 2020 | 90 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 90 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 80 scale 0-100 | -11.1% |
| 2023 | 90 scale 0-100 | +12.5% |
| 2024 | 90 scale 0-100 | +0.0% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's 90 scale 0-100 is above the median for low income countries, which is 66.6 scale 0-100, 1.4× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's 90 scale 0-100 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 80 scale 0-100, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | +100.0% | 20 scale 0-100 | 40 scale 0-100 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30 scale 0-100 | 20 scale 0-100 | 40 scale 0-100 | 6 |
| 2010s | 61 scale 0-100 | 30 scale 0-100 | 100 scale 0-100 | 10 |
| 2020s | 88 scale 0-100 | 80 scale 0-100 | 90 scale 0-100 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 61 Argentina 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Armenia 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Benin 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Burkina Faso 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 El Salvador 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Ethiopia 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Gambia 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Guatemala 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Honduras 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Hungary 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Kenya 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Laos 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Mauritius 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Mongolia 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Montenegro 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Mozambique 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Niger 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Pakistan 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Seychelles 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Slovakia 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Sri Lanka 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Tunisia 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 United Arab Emirates 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Uzbekistan 90 scale 0-100 compare
- 61 Zambia 90 scale 0-100 compare
More public sector data for Rwanda
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Democracy 3 (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected 1 (2025)
- Elected parliament 1 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda?
- Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score in Rwanda was 90 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 100 scale 0-100 in 2018.
- What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 20 scale 0-100 in 2004.
- How does Rwanda rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score?
- Rwanda ranks 61st out of 218 countries with data for 2024.
- Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 1 data use score rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 125.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The data use overall score is a composite score measuring the demand side of the statistical system. The data use pillar is segmented by five types of users: (i) the legislature, (ii) the executive branch, (iii) civil society (including sub-national actors), (iv) academia and (v) international bodies. Each dimension would have associated indicators to measure performance. A mature system would score well across all dimensions whereas a less mature one would have weaker scores along certain dimensions. The gaps would give insights into prioritization among user groups and help answer questions as to why the existing services are not resulting in higher use of national statistics in a particular segment. Currently, the SPI only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.