Statistical performance: Pillar 4 data sources score (scale) in China

China: Statistical performance: Pillar 4 data sources score (scale) was 40.7 scale 0-100 in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
40.7 scale 0-100
Change on year
up 6.3%
World rank
145th
of 183 countries
All-time high
45.84 scale 0-100
in 2015
All-time low
32.34 scale 0-100
in 2016
Years of data
10
2015–2024

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in China, 2015–2024

010203040502015201920242015: 45.8 scale 0-1002016: 32.3 scale 0-1002017: 35.9 scale 0-1002018: 35 scale 0-1002019: 43.3 scale 0-1002020: 41.6 scale 0-1002021: 39.9 scale 0-1002022: 38.3 scale 0-1002023: 38.3 scale 0-1002024: 40.7 scale 0-100

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in China stood at 40.7 scale 0-100.

That represents a change of up 6.3% on the previous year and down 11.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in China peaked at 45.84 scale 0-100 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 32.34 scale 0-100, in 2016.

China ranks 145th of 183 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Statistical performance: Pillar 4 data sources score (scale) in China, year by year

Annual values for Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100) in China, 2015 to 2024.
Year scale 0-100 Change
2015 45.84 scale 0-100 —
2016 32.34 scale 0-100 -29.4%
2017 35.92 scale 0-100 +11.1%
2018 34.97 scale 0-100 -2.6%
2019 43.3 scale 0-100 +23.8%
2020 41.62 scale 0-100 -3.9%
2021 39.92 scale 0-100 -4.1%
2022 38.27 scale 0-100 -4.1%
2023 38.27 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2024 40.7 scale 0-100 +6.3%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 40.7 scale 0-100 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 63.66 scale 0-100, 64% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • China's 40.7 scale 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.39 scale 0-100, 76% of the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 38.47 scale 0-100 32.34 scale 0-100 45.84 scale 0-100 5
2020s 39.76 scale 0-100 38.27 scale 0-100 41.62 scale 0-100 5

Countries ranked near China

  1. 142 Trinidad and Tobago 41.71 scale 0-100 compare
  2. 143 Sierra Leone 41.69 scale 0-100 compare
  3. 144 Niger 40.77 scale 0-100 compare
  4. 146 Dominica 40.46 scale 0-100 compare
  5. 147 Cameroon 39.83 scale 0-100 compare
  6. 148 Zimbabwe 39.8 scale 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More public sector data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in China?
Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in China was 40.7 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 45.84 scale 0-100 in 2015.
What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 32.34 scale 0-100 in 2016.
How does China rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
China ranks 145th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is down 11.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in China. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/china/">Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,776 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.