Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati

Kiribati: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score was 31.92 scale 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
31.92 scale 0-100
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
160th
of 183 countries
All-time high
31.92 scale 0-100
in 2023
All-time low
13.88 scale 0-100
in 2017
Years of data
10
2015–2024

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati, 2015–2024

01020302015201920242015: 15 scale 0-1002016: 16.2 scale 0-1002017: 13.9 scale 0-1002018: 13.9 scale 0-1002019: 15.5 scale 0-1002020: 23.9 scale 0-1002021: 22.2 scale 0-1002022: 30.2 scale 0-1002023: 31.9 scale 0-1002024: 31.9 scale 0-100

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Measured in scale 0-100.

Analysis

Kiribati recorded 31.92 scale 0-100 for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in 2024. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

The figure is up 113.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati peaked at 31.92 scale 0-100 in 2023 and was at its lowest, 13.88 scale 0-100, in 2017.

Kiribati ranks 160th of 183 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100) in Kiribati, 2015 to 2024.
Year scale 0-100 Change
2015 14.98 scale 0-100
2016 16.21 scale 0-100 +8.2%
2017 13.88 scale 0-100 -14.3%
2018 13.88 scale 0-100 +0.0%
2019 15.53 scale 0-100 +11.9%
2020 23.87 scale 0-100 +53.6%
2021 22.22 scale 0-100 -6.9%
2022 30.22 scale 0-100 +36.0%
2023 31.92 scale 0-100 +5.6%
2024 31.92 scale 0-100 +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 31.92 scale 0-100 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 45.88 scale 0-100, 70% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 31.92 scale 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.39 scale 0-100, 60% of the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 14.9 scale 0-100 13.88 scale 0-100 16.21 scale 0-100 5
2020s 28.03 scale 0-100 22.22 scale 0-100 31.92 scale 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 157 Guinea 34.72 scale 0-100 compare
  2. 158 Ethiopia 34.34 scale 0-100 compare
  3. 159 Guyana 33.71 scale 0-100 compare
  4. 161 Eswatini 31.17 scale 0-100 compare
  5. 162 Venezuela 30.57 scale 0-100 compare
  6. 163 Gabon 29.78 scale 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More public sector data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati?
Statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati was 31.92 scale 0-100 in 2024, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 31.92 scale 0-100 in 2023.
What is the lowest statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 13.88 scale 0-100 in 2017.
How does Kiribati rank for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Kiribati ranks 160th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
Is statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is up 113.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as part of Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/kiribati/">Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,776 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.