Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Paraguay
Paraguay: Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent was 0.2908 in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Paraguay, 2005–2020
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Paraguay is 0.2908, measured in 2020. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.
The figure is up 121.0% on the previous year and up 348.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Paraguay peaked at 0.2908 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -0.2177, in 2008.
That places Paraguay 6th out of 64 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | -0.108 | — |
| 2006 | -0.0904 | -16.2% |
| 2007 | -0.1169 | +29.3% |
| 2008 | -0.2177 | +86.3% |
| 2009 | -0.0564 | -74.1% |
| 2010 | -0.1172 | +107.8% |
| 2011 | -0.0905 | -22.8% |
| 2012 | 0.0236 | -126.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0485 | +105.6% |
| 2014 | 0.0072 | -85.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0383 | +433.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0064 | -83.2% |
| 2017 | 0.0256 | +298.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0406 | +58.9% |
| 2019 | 0.1316 | +223.8% |
| 2020 | 0.2908 | +121.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.1179 | -0.2177 | -0.0564 | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0114 | -0.1172 | 0.1316 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2908 | 0.2908 | 0.2908 | 1 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
More public sector data for Paraguay
- Arms imports 5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.748 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2013)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 5.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 59.74 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0093 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 4.12 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 413.97 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 12.58 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Paraguay?
- Vertical fiscal imbalance, percent in Paraguay was 0.2908 in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2908 in 2020.
- What is the lowest vertical fiscal imbalance, percent recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2177 in 2008.
- How does Paraguay rank for vertical fiscal imbalance, percent?
- Paraguay ranks 6th out of 64 countries with data for 2020.
- Is vertical fiscal imbalance, percent rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is up 348.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Vertical fiscal imbalance, Percent (Central government). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.