China vs Russia: Armed forces personnel, total

China
2.54 million
in 2020
Russia
1.45 million
in 2020
China rank
2nd
Russia rank
4th

Armed forces personnel, total over time

  • China
  • Russia
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M198520022020

How they compare

China currently reports 2.54 million against 1.45 million in Russia, a difference of 1.08 million.

That makes China's figure about 1.7 times Russia's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 2nd and Russia ranks 4th of 173 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Russia Difference Ahead
1990s 3.58 million 1.65 million 1.93 million China
2000s 3.51 million 1.44 million 2.07 million China
2010s 2.83 million 1.40 million 1.43 million China
2020s 2.54 million 1.45 million 1.08 million China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher armed forces personnel, total, China or Russia?
China, at 2.54 million against 1.45 million in Russia as of 2020.
What is the difference in armed forces personnel, total between China and Russia?
1.08 million, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
How do China and Russia rank globally for armed forces personnel, total?
China ranks 2nd and Russia ranks 4th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies, published as Armed forces personnel, total. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Armed forces personnel, total
Source
The Military Balance, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 6,823 data points, 1985–2020
Last refreshed

Armed forces personnel are active duty military personnel, including paramilitary forces if the training, organization, equipment, and control suggest they may be used to support or replace regular military forces.