Caribbean Small States vs Georgia: CPIA building human resources rating
CPIA building human resources rating over time
- Caribbean Small States
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.21 1=low to 6=high in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 0.29 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Caribbean Small States's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Caribbean Small States ranks 5th and Georgia ranks 2nd of 42 groups.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean Small States | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.94 1=low to 6=high | 4.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.26 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
| 2010s | 4.17 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.325 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia building human resources rating, Caribbean Small States or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.21 1=low to 6=high in Caribbean Small States as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia building human resources rating between Caribbean Small States and Georgia?
- 0.29 1=low to 6=high, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and Georgia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Caribbean Small States and Georgia rank globally for cpia building human resources rating?
- Caribbean Small States ranks 5th and Georgia ranks 2nd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.