Micronesia (country) vs Tuvalu: CPIA building human resources rating
CPIA building human resources rating over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 65th and Tuvalu ranks 65th of 84 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia building human resources rating, Micronesia (country) or Tuvalu?
- Micronesia (country), at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia building human resources rating between Micronesia (country) and Tuvalu?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Tuvalu?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Tuvalu rank globally for cpia building human resources rating?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 65th and Tuvalu ranks 65th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.