Somalia vs South Sudan: CPIA building human resources rating

Somalia
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
South Sudan
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Somalia rank
79th
South Sudan rank
79th

CPIA building human resources rating over time

  • Somalia
  • South Sudan
00.511.522.5201220182025

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was South Sudan ahead.

Somalia ranks 79th and South Sudan ranks 79th of 85 countries.

Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Somalia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 2.25 1=low to 6=high 2.25 1=low to 6=high 0 1=low to 6=high
2020s 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2.33 1=low to 6=high 0.1667 1=low to 6=high Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia building human resources rating, Somalia or South Sudan?
Somalia, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia building human resources rating between Somalia and South Sudan?
0 1=low to 6=high, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Somalia and South Sudan rank globally for cpia building human resources rating?
Somalia ranks 79th and South Sudan ranks 79th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Somalia vs South Sudan: CPIA building human resources rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/somalia-fed-rep/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/somalia-fed-rep/south-sudan/">Somalia vs South Sudan: CPIA building human resources rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.