Viet Nam vs Zambia: CPIA business regulatory environment rating
CPIA business regulatory environment rating over time
- Viet Nam
- Zambia
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Zambia, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Viet Nam ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 12th of 85 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Viet Nam | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia business regulatory environment rating, Viet Nam or Zambia?
- Viet Nam, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Zambia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in cpia business regulatory environment rating between Viet Nam and Zambia?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Viet Nam and Zambia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Viet Nam and Zambia rank globally for cpia business regulatory environment rating?
- Viet Nam ranks 12th and Zambia ranks 12th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Business Regulatory Environment criterion assesses the extent to which the legal, regulatory, and policy environment helps or hinders private business in investing, creating jobs, and becoming more productive. The emphasis is on direct regulations of business activity and regulation of goods and factor markets. Three sub-components are measured: (a) regulations affecting entry, exit, and competition; (b) regulations of ongoing business operations; and (c) regulations of factor markets (labor and land).