CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high) by country

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These...

Countries reporting
85
Highest
5.5 1=low to 6=high
Georgia
Lowest
1 1=low to 6=high
Eritrea
Median
3 1=low to 6=high
Years covered
21
2005–2025
Data points
2,460

What the numbers show

CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high) is currently reported for 85 countries. The highest value is 5.5 1=low to 6=high in Georgia; the lowest is 1 1=low to 6=high in Eritrea.

The median across all reporting countries is 3 1=low to 6=high, and the mean is 3.06 1=low to 6=high.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 6.

Over the past decade 20 countries rose and 27 fell. The largest increase was in Zimbabwe (up 50.0%), and the largest decrease in Nicaragua (down 42.9%).

CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Georgia 5.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 37.5% rising
2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 12.5% rising
2 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
4 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high 2010 up 14.3% rising
4 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
4 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
4 Kenya 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% flat
4 Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high 2019 up 14.3% rising
4 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 33.3% rising
4 Kosovo 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
4 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
12 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
12 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
12 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
12 Cote d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
12 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
12 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
12 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
12 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
12 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 22.2% falling
12 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
12 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
12 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2019 unchanged flat
12 Mauritania 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% falling
12 Niger 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
12 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
12 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
12 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% falling
12 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
12 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 16.7% rising
12 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
12 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2015 unchanged flat
12 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
12 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
35 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
35 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
35 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
35 Democratic Republic of Congo 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
35 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
35 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% falling
35 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% falling
35 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
35 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
35 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% falling
35 Grenada 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 25.0% falling
35 India 3 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 14.3% falling
35 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
35 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% falling
35 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% falling
35 Mali 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% falling
35 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
35 Malawi 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
35 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
35 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
35 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
35 Tajikistan 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
35 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
35 Tanzania 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% falling
35 Uganda 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 25.0% falling
35 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
35 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 50.0% rising
62 Bolivia 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 16.7% falling
62 Guinea-Bissau 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
62 Guyana 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 16.7% falling
62 Honduras 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 16.7% falling
62 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
62 Liberia 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 16.7% falling
62 Marshall Islands 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
62 Myanmar 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
62 Sierra Leone 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 16.7% flat
62 Chad 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
62 East Timor 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 25.0% rising
62 Tuvalu 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
74 Afghanistan 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.0% falling
74 Angola 2 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
74 Central African Republic 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
74 Congo 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.0% falling
74 Micronesia (country) 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
74 Haiti 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
74 Nicaragua 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 42.9% falling
74 Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling
74 Somalia 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 33.3% rising
74 Yemen 2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.0% falling
84 South Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 25.0% falling
85 Eritrea 1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA business regulatory environment rating by country. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-business-regulatory-environment-rating-1-low-to-6-high/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-business-regulatory-environment-rating-1-low-to-6-high/">CPIA business regulatory environment rating by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Business Regulatory Environment criterion assesses the extent to which the legal, regulatory, and policy environment helps or hinders private business in investing, creating jobs, and becoming more productive. The emphasis is on direct regulations of business activity and regulation of goods and factor markets. Three sub-components are measured: (a) regulations affecting entry, exit, and competition; (b) regulations of ongoing business operations; and (c) regulations of factor markets (labor and land).