Central African Republic vs Micronesia, Federated States of: CPIA debt policy rating
CPIA debt policy rating over time
- Central African Republic
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 43rd and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 43rd of 85 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.78 1=low to 6=high | 2.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.4444 1=low to 6=high | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 2.92 1=low to 6=high | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia debt policy rating, Central African Republic or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Central African Republic, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia debt policy rating between Central African Republic and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for cpia debt policy rating?
- Central African Republic ranks 43rd and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 43rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).