CPIA debt policy rating in Micronesia (Federated States of)
Micronesia (Federated States of): CPIA debt policy rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA debt policy rating in Micronesia (Federated States of), 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia debt policy rating in Micronesia (Federated States of) stood at 3 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia debt policy rating in Micronesia (Federated States of) peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2024 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2012.
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 42nd of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.33 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Micronesia (Federated States of)
- 42 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high
- 42 Cape Verde 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Central African Republic 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Dominica 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Ghana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Kenya 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Mongolia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Myanmar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Papua New Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Saint Lucia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Tajikistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Vanuatu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 42 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 62.15 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0158 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Tax revenue 7.0% (2020)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 10.9% (2020)
- Taxes on goods and services 3.4% (2020)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 10.5% (2020)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) 6.9% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.4% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia debt policy rating in Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- Cpia debt policy rating in Micronesia (Federated States of) was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2024.
- What is the lowest cpia debt policy rating recorded in Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- How does Micronesia (Federated States of) rank for cpia debt policy rating?
- Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 42nd out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia debt policy rating rising or falling in Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Micronesia (Federated States of) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).