Azerbaijan vs Rwanda: CPIA economic management cluster average

Azerbaijan
4.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2010
Rwanda
4.17 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
4th
Rwanda rank
7th

CPIA economic management cluster average over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Rwanda
012345200520152025

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 4.33 1=low to 6=high against 4.17 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda, a difference of 0.16 1=low to 6=high.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 84 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 4.53 1=low to 6=high 3.76 1=low to 6=high 0.7733 1=low to 6=high Azerbaijan
2010s 4.33 1=low to 6=high 3.83 1=low to 6=high 0.5 1=low to 6=high Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Azerbaijan or Rwanda?
Azerbaijan, at 4.33 1=low to 6=high against 4.17 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda as of 2010.
What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Azerbaijan and Rwanda?
0.16 1=low to 6=high, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Rwanda?
6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
How do Azerbaijan and Rwanda rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
Azerbaijan ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Rwanda: CPIA economic management cluster average. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/azerbaijan/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/azerbaijan/rwanda/">Azerbaijan vs Rwanda: CPIA economic management cluster average</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.