CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) by country

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for...

Countries reporting
85
Highest
4.67 1=low to 6=high
Georgia
Lowest
1.5 1=low to 6=high
South Sudan
Median
3.33 1=low to 6=high
Years covered
21
2005–2025
Data points
2,460

What the numbers show

CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) is currently reported for 85 countries. The highest value is 4.67 1=low to 6=high in Georgia; the lowest is 1.5 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan.

The median across all reporting countries is 3.33 1=low to 6=high, and the mean is 3.29 1=low to 6=high.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 3.

Over the past decade 38 countries rose and 41 fell. The largest increase was in Gambia (up 53.8%), and the largest decrease in Myanmar (down 50.0%).

CPIA economic management cluster average: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Georgia 4.67 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 12.0% rising
2 Armenia 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 15.6% falling
2 Kosovo 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 22.7% rising
2 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 4.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 22.7% rising
5 Azerbaijan 4.33 1=low to 6=high 2010 down 3.7% flat
6 Cote d'Ivoire 4.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 18.2% rising
6 Samoa 4.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.0% rising
8 Mauritania 4.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 19.0% rising
8 Rwanda 4.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.2% rising
8 Tanzania 4.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.2% falling
8 Uzbekistan 4.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.2% rising
12 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.3% rising
12 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.3% falling
12 Grenada 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 33.3% rising
12 Guyana 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 9.1% flat
12 India 4 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
12 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.3% falling
12 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
12 Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high 2019 up 9.1% rising
12 Togo 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 41.2% rising
21 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
22 Kenya 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.5% falling
22 Mali 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 0.0% falling
22 Nicaragua 3.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 8.0% falling
25 Bolivia 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 8.3% falling
25 Vietnam 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 15.4% falling
27 Bhutan 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.3% falling
27 Cameroon 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.8% flat
27 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.8% rising
27 Dominica 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% flat
27 Guinea 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 10.0% rising
27 Saint Lucia 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 22.2% falling
27 Madagascar 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% flat
27 Nigeria 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.3% falling
27 Uganda 3.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.0% falling
36 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 8.7% falling
36 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.5% falling
36 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
36 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 10.5% rising
36 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.0% falling
41 Ethiopia 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.8% falling
41 Fiji 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.3% rising
41 Gambia 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 53.8% falling
41 Liberia 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.8% flat
41 Nepal 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.3% falling
41 Tonga 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.8% rising
41 Vanuatu 3.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.1% flat
48 Burundi 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 11.8% falling
48 Lesotho 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 0.0% falling
48 Mongolia 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2019 up 0.0% falling
48 Niger 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 17.4% flat
48 Pakistan 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.0% falling
48 Solomon Islands 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.0% flat
48 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.0% falling
48 Zambia 3.17 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.6% falling
56 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 20.0% rising
56 Congo 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 14.3% flat
56 Ghana 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
56 Guinea-Bissau 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 20.0% rising
56 Laos 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 10.0% falling
56 Senegal 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 28.0% falling
62 Central African Republic 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.6% rising
62 Micronesia (country) 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.2% rising
62 Sri Lanka 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 0.0% falling
62 Sierra Leone 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 19.0% falling
62 East Timor 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 22.7% falling
62 Zimbabwe 2.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.2% rising
68 Comoros 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.9% rising
68 Djibouti 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.1% falling
68 Haiti 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 23.8% falling
68 Marshall Islands 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 14.3% rising
68 Papua New Guinea 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.1% falling
68 Tuvalu 2.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.7% rising
74 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.2% falling
74 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 36.4% rising
74 Sao Tome and Principe 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.8% falling
77 Mozambique 2.33 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 39.1% falling
78 Myanmar 1.83 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 50.0% falling
79 Maldives 1.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 28.6% falling
79 Malawi 1.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 41.2% falling
79 Yemen 1.67 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 41.2% falling
82 Afghanistan 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 50.0% falling
82 Eritrea 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.5% falling
82 Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 35.7% falling
82 South Sudan 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA economic management cluster average by country. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/">CPIA economic management cluster average by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.