Burkina Faso vs IBRD only: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Burkina Faso
- IBRD only
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.58 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only, a difference of 0.42 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times IBRD only's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 12th and IBRD only ranks 6th of 85 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.36 1=low to 6=high | 4.08 1=low to 6=high | 0.2846 1=low to 6=high | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 3.95 1=low to 6=high | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 0.2697 1=low to 6=high | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Burkina Faso or IBRD only?
- Burkina Faso, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.58 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Burkina Faso and IBRD only?
- 0.42 1=low to 6=high, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and IBRD only?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and IBRD only rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Burkina Faso ranks 12th and IBRD only ranks 6th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.