Cabo Verde vs Chad: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Cabo Verde
- Chad
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Chad, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 35th and Chad ranks 35th of 84 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4 1=low to 6=high | 2.84 1=low to 6=high | 1.56 1=low to 6=high | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | 2.82 1=low to 6=high | 0.8167 1=low to 6=high | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 0.2778 1=low to 6=high | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Cabo Verde or Chad?
- Cabo Verde, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Cabo Verde and Chad?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Chad?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Cabo Verde and Chad rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Cabo Verde ranks 35th and Chad ranks 35th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.