Central African Republic vs Sri Lanka: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Central African Republic
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 2.83 1=low to 6=high against 2.83 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.73 1=low to 6=high | 3.14 1=low to 6=high | 0.4133 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 0.0238 1=low to 6=high | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 3.04 1=low to 6=high | 2.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.7083 1=low to 6=high | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Central African Republic or Sri Lanka?
- Central African Republic, at 2.83 1=low to 6=high against 2.83 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Central African Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Sri Lanka rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Central African Republic ranks 62nd and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.