Democratic Republic of Congo vs Vietnam: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Vietnam
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.67 1=low to 6=high in Vietnam, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 26th and Vietnam ranks 24th of 84 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 4.39 1=low to 6=high | 1.22 1=low to 6=high | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 4.03 1=low to 6=high | 0.6944 1=low to 6=high | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Democratic Republic of Congo or Vietnam?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.67 1=low to 6=high in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Democratic Republic of Congo and Vietnam?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Vietnam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Vietnam rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 26th and Vietnam ranks 24th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.