Grenada vs Lower middle income: CPIA economic management cluster average

Grenada
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Lower middle income
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Grenada rank
11th
Lower middle income rank
14th

CPIA economic management cluster average over time

  • Grenada
  • Lower middle income
01234200520152025

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.67 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.2 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lower middle income ahead.

Grenada ranks 11th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 84 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Lower middle income in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Lower middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 3.1 1=low to 6=high 3.48 1=low to 6=high 0.3843 1=low to 6=high Lower middle income
2010s 3.1 1=low to 6=high 3.47 1=low to 6=high 0.3694 1=low to 6=high Lower middle income
2020s 3.89 1=low to 6=high 3.34 1=low to 6=high 0.547 1=low to 6=high Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Grenada or Lower middle income?
Grenada, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Lower middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Grenada and Lower middle income?
0.67 1=low to 6=high, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Lower middle income?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Grenada and Lower middle income rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
Grenada ranks 11th and Lower middle income ranks 14th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Lower middle income: CPIA economic management cluster average. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/grenada/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/grenada/lower-middle-income/">Grenada vs Lower middle income: CPIA economic management cluster average</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.