Guinea vs Pacific island small states: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Guinea
- Pacific island small states
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.13 1=low to 6=high in Pacific island small states, a difference of 0.54 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Pacific island small states's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Pacific island small states ahead.
Guinea ranks 27th and Pacific island small states ranks 28th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Pacific island small states in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Pacific island small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.73 1=low to 6=high | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 0.6347 1=low to 6=high | Pacific island small states |
| 2010s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 0.1013 1=low to 6=high | Guinea |
| 2020s | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 0.5463 1=low to 6=high | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Guinea or Pacific island small states?
- Guinea, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.13 1=low to 6=high in Pacific island small states as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Guinea and Pacific island small states?
- 0.54 1=low to 6=high, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Pacific island small states?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and Pacific island small states rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Guinea ranks 27th and Pacific island small states ranks 28th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.