IDA total vs Mali: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- IDA total
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 3.83 1=low to 6=high against 3.17 1=low to 6=high in IDA total, a difference of 0.66 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times IDA total's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
IDA total ranks 21st and Mali ranks 21st of 42 groups.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 4.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.8725 1=low to 6=high | Mali |
| 2010s | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 3.93 1=low to 6=high | 0.6171 1=low to 6=high | Mali |
| 2020s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.83 1=low to 6=high | 0.6521 1=low to 6=high | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, IDA total or Mali?
- Mali, at 3.83 1=low to 6=high against 3.17 1=low to 6=high in IDA total as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between IDA total and Mali?
- 0.66 1=low to 6=high, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Mali?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do IDA total and Mali rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- IDA total ranks 21st and Mali ranks 21st of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.