Malawi vs South Sudan: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Malawi
- South Sudan
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1.67 1=low to 6=high against 1.5 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan, a difference of 0.17 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 81st of 84 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.92 1=low to 6=high | 1.37 1=low to 6=high | 1.54 1=low to 6=high | Malawi |
| 2020s | 2.22 1=low to 6=high | 1.47 1=low to 6=high | 0.75 1=low to 6=high | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Malawi or South Sudan?
- Malawi, at 1.67 1=low to 6=high against 1.5 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Malawi and South Sudan?
- 0.17 1=low to 6=high, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and South Sudan rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Malawi ranks 78th and South Sudan ranks 81st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.