Micronesia, Federated States of vs Timor-Leste: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 2.83 1=low to 6=high against 2.83 1=low to 6=high in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 61st and Timor-Leste ranks 61st of 84 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.56 1=low to 6=high | 3.52 1=low to 6=high | 0.963 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 2.72 1=low to 6=high | 2.92 1=low to 6=high | 0.1944 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Micronesia, Federated States of or Timor-Leste?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 2.83 1=low to 6=high against 2.83 1=low to 6=high in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Micronesia, Federated States of and Timor-Leste?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Timor-Leste?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Timor-Leste rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 61st and Timor-Leste ranks 61st of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.