Nepal vs Tonga: CPIA economic management cluster average

Nepal
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Tonga
3.33 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Nepal rank
40th
Tonga rank
40th

CPIA economic management cluster average over time

  • Nepal
  • Tonga
01234200520152025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Tonga, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 40th and Tonga ranks 40th of 84 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 3.71 1=low to 6=high 2.87 1=low to 6=high 0.84 1=low to 6=high Nepal
2010s 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.32 1=low to 6=high 0.1167 1=low to 6=high Tonga
2020s 3.31 1=low to 6=high 3.33 1=low to 6=high 0.0278 1=low to 6=high Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Nepal or Tonga?
Nepal, at 3.33 1=low to 6=high against 3.33 1=low to 6=high in Tonga as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Nepal and Tonga?
0 1=low to 6=high, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tonga?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Tonga rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
Nepal ranks 40th and Tonga ranks 40th of 84 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Tonga: CPIA economic management cluster average. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/nepal/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-economic-management-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/nepal/tonga/">Nepal vs Tonga: CPIA economic management cluster average</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.