Pre-demographic dividend vs Viet Nam: CPIA economic management cluster average
CPIA economic management cluster average over time
- Pre-demographic dividend
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.14 1=low to 6=high in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.53 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Pre-demographic dividend ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 42 groups.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pre-demographic dividend | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 4.39 1=low to 6=high | 1.07 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 4.03 1=low to 6=high | 0.6555 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, Pre-demographic dividend or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 3.67 1=low to 6=high against 3.14 1=low to 6=high in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2015.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between Pre-demographic dividend and Viet Nam?
- 0.53 1=low to 6=high, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pre-demographic dividend and Viet Nam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Pre-demographic dividend and Viet Nam rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- Pre-demographic dividend ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.