East Timor vs Zimbabwe: CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high) over time
- East Timor
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 2.83 1=low to 6=high against 2.83 1=low to 6=high in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was East Timor ahead.
East Timor ranks 62nd and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 85 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Timor | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 1.17 1=low to 6=high | 1.92 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2010s | 3.52 1=low to 6=high | 2.18 1=low to 6=high | 1.33 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2020s | 2.92 1=low to 6=high | 2.58 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia economic management cluster average, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
- East Timor, at 2.83 1=low to 6=high against 2.83 1=low to 6=high in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia economic management cluster average between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for cpia economic management cluster average?
- East Timor ranks 62nd and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Economic Management cluster includes monetary and exchange rate policies, fiscal policy, and debt policy.