East Asia & Pacific vs Mongolia: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.18 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.32 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 25th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.1326 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.09 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating, East Asia & Pacific or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.18 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating between East Asia & Pacific and Mongolia?
- 0.32 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Mongolia rank globally for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 25th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.