Statizoid

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific

East Asia & Pacific: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating was 3.18 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.18 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
25th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.55 1=low to 6=high
in 2010
All-time low
3.14 1=low to 6=high
in 2022
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific is 3.18 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 3.55 1=low to 6=high in 2010 and was at its lowest, 3.14 1=low to 6=high, in 2022.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 25th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.23 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.29 1=low to 6=high +2.0%
2007 3.18 1=low to 6=high -3.3%
2008 3.23 1=low to 6=high +1.4%
2009 3.41 1=low to 6=high +5.6%
2010 3.55 1=low to 6=high +4.0%
2011 3.46 1=low to 6=high -2.4%
2012 3.39 1=low to 6=high -2.0%
2013 3.37 1=low to 6=high -0.8%
2014 3.4 1=low to 6=high +1.0%
2015 3.43 1=low to 6=high +1.0%
2016 3.39 1=low to 6=high -1.2%
2017 3.39 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.39 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.32 1=low to 6=high -2.1%
2020 3.32 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.25 1=low to 6=high -2.2%
2022 3.14 1=low to 6=high -3.3%
2023 3.14 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.18 1=low to 6=high +1.1%
2025 3.18 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.27 1=low to 6=high 3.18 1=low to 6=high 3.41 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.41 1=low to 6=high 3.32 1=low to 6=high 3.55 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.14 1=low to 6=high 3.32 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific

  1. 22 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 22 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 22 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 22 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 22 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 22 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 22 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 22 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 22 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 22 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 22 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 22 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 22 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 22 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 22 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 22 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 22 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 22 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 22 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 22 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 22 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 22 Papua New Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 22 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 22 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 22 Tanzania, United Republic of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  26. 22 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  27. 22 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for East Asia & Pacific

All data for East Asia & Pacific →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific?
Cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific was 3.18 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
The highest recorded value was 3.55 1=low to 6=high in 2010.
What is the lowest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
The lowest recorded value was 3.14 1=low to 6=high in 2022.
How does East Asia & Pacific rank for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 25th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
Over the last ten years it is down 7.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-efficiency-of-revenue-mobilization-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-efficiency-of-revenue-mobilization-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/">CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in East Asia & Pacific</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.