Republic of Moldova vs Saint Lucia: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 22nd and Saint Lucia ranks 22nd of 85 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.6 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.25 1=low to 6=high | 0.75 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating, Republic of Moldova or Saint Lucia?
- Republic of Moldova, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating between Republic of Moldova and Saint Lucia?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Saint Lucia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Saint Lucia rank globally for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 22nd and Saint Lucia ranks 22nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.