CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Moldova

Moldova: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
22nd
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2007
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Moldova, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Moldova recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Moldova peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

Moldova ranks 22nd of 85 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) in Moldova, 2005 to 2019.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2008 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 88% of the median. (9 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 22 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 22 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 22 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 22 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 22 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 22 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 22 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high
  8. 22 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 22 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 22 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 22 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 22 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 22 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 22 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 22 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 22 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 22 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 22 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 22 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 22 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 22 Papua New Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 22 Sri Lanka 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 22 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 22 Tanzania 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 22 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  26. 22 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Moldova?
Cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Moldova was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
What is the lowest cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Moldova rank for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
Moldova ranks 22nd out of 85 countries with data for 2019.
Is cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-efficiency-of-revenue-mobilization-rating-1-low-to-6-high/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-efficiency-of-revenue-mobilization-rating-1-low-to-6-high/moldova/">CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.