Angola vs Solomon Islands: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Angola
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Solomon Islands
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Angola rank
75th
Solomon Islands rank
75th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Angola
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Angola currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 75th and Solomon Islands ranks 75th of 85 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Angola or Solomon Islands?
- Angola, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Solomon Islands as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Angola and Solomon Islands rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Angola ranks 75th and Solomon Islands ranks 75th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.