CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Angola
Angola: CPIA equity of public resource use rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Angola, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2013, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Angola stood at 2.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Angola peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Angola 75th out of 85 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.
CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Angola, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 75 Afghanistan 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 75 Eritrea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 75 Haiti 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 75 Marshall Islands 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 75 Micronesia, Federated States of 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 75 Solomon Islands 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 75 Yemen 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Angola
- Arms imports 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.4223 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 6.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 24.34 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0089 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -26.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 922.05 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 12.03 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in Angola?
- Cpia equity of public resource use rating in Angola was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Angola rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Angola ranks 75th out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.