Bosnia and Herzegovina vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): CPIA equity of public resource use rating
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.18 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th of 85 countries.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.46 1=low to 6=high | 0.3568 1=low to 6=high | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | 0.0414 1=low to 6=high | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Bosnia and Herzegovina or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Bosnia and Herzegovina and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 0.18 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.