CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▲ Rising
Latest (2013)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
30th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013
CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina compared with similar countries
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 88% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 30 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 30 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 3.7 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.