CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA equity of public resource use rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
30th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2009
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013

012342005200920132005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year

Annual values for CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005 to 2013.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high
2006 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Bosnia and Herzegovina compared with similar countries

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (21 countries reporting)
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 88% of the median. (9 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.1 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4

Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina

  1. 30 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 30 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 30 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 30 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 30 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 30 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 30 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 30 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 30 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 30 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 30 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 30 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 30 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 30 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 30 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 30 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 30 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 30 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 30 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 30 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 30 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 30 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 30 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 30 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Bosnia and Herzegovina

All data for Bosnia and Herzegovina →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Cpia equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.