Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kosovo: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Kosovo
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
30th
Kosovo rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kosovo
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th and Kosovo ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 0.375 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kosovo?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 30th and Kosovo ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.