What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?

0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?

21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating

Congo, Democratic Republic of the

3.5 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Zimbabwe

3.5 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank

30th

Zimbabwe rank

30th

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 85 countries.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo, Democratic Republic of the	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	3 1=low to 6=high	1.4 1=low to 6=high	1.6 1=low to 6=high	Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s	3.3 1=low to 6=high	2.65 1=low to 6=high	0.65 1=low to 6=high	Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s	3.5 1=low to 6=high	3.5 1=low to 6=high	0 1=low to 6=high	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Zimbabwe?: Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?: 0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Zimbabwe rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?: Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/congo-dem-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.