Statizoid

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
30th
of 84 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2018
All-time low
1 1=low to 6=high
in 2008
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe, 2005–2025

11.522.533.52005201520252005: 1.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 1.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 1.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 1 1=low to 6=high2009: 1.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 2 1=low to 6=high2011: 2 1=low to 6=high2012: 2 1=low to 6=high2013: 2 1=low to 6=high2014: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of up 16.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2018 and was at its lowest, 1 1=low to 6=high, in 2008.

Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 1.5 1=low to 6=high —
2006 1.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 1.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 1 1=low to 6=high -33.3%
2009 1.5 1=low to 6=high +50.0%
2010 2 1=low to 6=high +33.3%
2011 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 2.5 1=low to 6=high +25.0%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high +20.0%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2019 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.4 1=low to 6=high 1 1=low to 6=high 1.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 2.65 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 30 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 30 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 30 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 30 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 30 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 30 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 30 Djibouti 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 30 Ethiopia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 30 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 30 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 30 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 30 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 30 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 30 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 30 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 30 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 30 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 30 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 30 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 30 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 30 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 30 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 30 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe?
Cpia equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2018.
What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 1 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
How does Zimbabwe rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
Zimbabwe ranks 30th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/zimbabwe/">CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.