East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating

East Asia & Pacific
3.32 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Zimbabwe
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
30th

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Zimbabwe
1234200520152025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.18 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 42 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 3.46 1=low to 6=high 1.4 1=low to 6=high 2.06 1=low to 6=high East Asia & Pacific
2010s 3.41 1=low to 6=high 2.65 1=low to 6=high 0.7611 1=low to 6=high East Asia & Pacific
2020s 3.33 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.1667 1=low to 6=high Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, East Asia & Pacific or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?
0.18 1=low to 6=high, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/zimbabwe/">East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.