Fiji vs Kiribati: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Fiji
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Kiribati
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Fiji rank
13th
Kiribati rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Fiji
- Kiribati
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Kiribati, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 13th and Kiribati ranks 13th of 85 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Fiji or Kiribati?
- Fiji, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Fiji and Kiribati?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Kiribati?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Kiribati rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Fiji ranks 13th and Kiribati ranks 13th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.