CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) in Fiji
Fiji: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA equity of public resource use rating in Fiji, 2020–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Fiji recorded 4 1=low to 6=high for cpia equity of public resource use rating in 2025. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Fiji ranks 13th of 85 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) in Fiji, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2021 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Fiji compared with similar countries
- Fiji's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Fiji's 4 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.3× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Fiji
- 13 Azerbaijan 4 1=low to 6=high
- 13 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Bolivia 4 1=low to 6=high
- 13 Cambodia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Chad 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 India 4 1=low to 6=high
- 13 Kenya 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Kiribati 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Kyrgyzstan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Malawi 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Mali 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Mongolia 4 1=low to 6=high
- 13 Niger 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Senegal 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Uganda 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 13 Zambia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Fiji
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 17.23 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0027 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia equity of public resource use rating in Fiji?
- Cpia equity of public resource use rating in Fiji was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Fiji?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- What is the lowest cpia equity of public resource use rating recorded in Fiji?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- How does Fiji rank for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Fiji ranks 13th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia equity of public resource use rating rising or falling in Fiji?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Fiji data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.