Fiji vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Fiji
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
3.46 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Fiji rank
13th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
11th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Fiji
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.46 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.54 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 85 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Fiji or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Fiji, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.46 1=low to 6=high in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Fiji and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 0.54 1=low to 6=high, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Fiji ranks 13th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.