Grenada vs Honduras: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Grenada
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Honduras
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Grenada rank
30th
Honduras rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Grenada
- Honduras
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Honduras, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 30th and Honduras ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Honduras |
| 2010s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 4.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.9 1=low to 6=high | Honduras |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.92 1=low to 6=high | 0.6667 1=low to 6=high | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Grenada or Honduras?
- Grenada, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Grenada and Honduras?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Honduras?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Honduras rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Grenada ranks 30th and Honduras ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.